What we learned at Open Data Camp and Mozfest and why it is relevant for Grantmaking

October was a busy month for data and tech events for 360Giving! On the weekend of 21-22 October, I attended my first Open Data Camp in Belfast. The following week I attended Mozfest, the annual festival of Mozilla, the parent company of the browser Firefox. Taking place in London and bringing people from all over the world, Mozfest focused on the free internet. This is what I learned.

Credit: Giuseppe Sollazzo

 

Open Data Camp

For those of you who are not familiar with it, Open Data Camp UK is an event where open data practitioners meet to discuss, network and learn about open data in an unconference way. Yes, I said “un-conference”. What does that involve? It’s an interactive way to share learnings. Instead of panels and a fixed schedule, participants decide the agenda on the day and host their own sessions.

It was great to see the vibe and critical thinking of the UK community around open data. Furthermore, it was great to see the enthusiasm of the open data community in Northern Ireland and how so many people – from students to government employees and the charity sector – are there to promote and discuss open data. I’ve not seen much government participation in un-conferences before as they’re so informal, so I was pleased to see so many people from the Northern Ireland government organising it!

Key takeaways from Open Data Camp:

  1.    Data use is a hot topic – Using data is still not easy for a lot of people. There are barriers we need to tackle to help more people to actually use data and use it well. I was very excited to see some practical guidance like the ‘Getting More Value out of Open Data Publishing’ document that was created during the event, helping us to share knowledge and experiences of how to make sure that data that is published is actually used. If you want to learn more about data use and how we approach it here at 360Giving, check out my previous blog about it.
  2.   NICVA is doing some great work with data – Andrea Thornbury from NICVA (Northern Ireland Council for Voluntary Action) presented some of their work of Detail Data. It was inspiring to see how data can help charities to achieve better project planning and in some cases even funding.
  3.  It’s time to refresh some old open data definitions – If we want more people to use and publish open data, we need to re-write some of our data definitions in a relatable manner, so everyone can understand them. Some of these definitions, like machine readable format, are not even clear to the most savvy people in the open data community. The Open Data Handbook has some good definitions, but maybe we need a collective effort to refresh some of them?

 

Credit: Mozilla Festival

Mozfest

Mozfest is a festival that celebrates the freedom of the internet and brings together people from different communities to learn and collaborate about different topics like diversity, inclusivity and web literacy. Open data is one of many topics that was discussed as a catalyst for a better internet. While Mozfest is quite tech oriented, here are some takeaways that are relevant for the grantmaking community.

Key takeaways from Mozfest:

  1.    Teaching tech literacy through games: Games can be an easy and fun way to learn about data. I learned about BetaNYC’s open data card game that teaches about the open 311 standards (the standard the is used for a service call to the local council or FixMyStreet). I also learned how games can help to research Alzheimer’s. Maybe games can help us do better grantmaking?
  2.    Glossaries for better literacy: Brendan from 18F, the US equivalent of the UK Government Digital Service, showcased an FBI project around crime data. One of the tools they used to help people to understand the project was this glossary, which looks like it could be a good addition to our GrantNav platform.
  3.    Network cantered resources: This session focused on how to create better resources for knowledge sharing within a network of practice. This made me think about what’s needed for our community and how we can we create them together. If you have some ideas, please let me know!

If you want to discuss any of the points above further, please send me an email labs@threesixtygiving.org

 

Posted in Blog

360Giving calls on government to open up its grantmaking data to achieve new ‘joined up’ charities strategy

The government’s new joined up Civil Society strategy announced yesterday will take a giant leap forward by opening up all its grantmaking data, says 360Giving.

Will Perrin, co-founder of 360Giving, said:

“It’s fantastic that the government is aiming for a joined up approach to the way Whitehall works with charities. Tracey Crouch is an effective operator and she can pull it off.
“For a quick start the government should publish the Cabinet Office database of all government grants as open data with as much detail as possible. Then, through tools like GrantNav the government can see all its own work on one screen and compare to the sector’s own grantmaking. Without comparable data joining up is a nightmare.”

The new strategy aims to coordinate and improve how public sector bodies interact with the charity sector. They say it is not about finding new funding for charities but making better use of the resources the government already has available.

Rachel Rank, CEO of 360Giving and member of the Charity Commission Digital Advisory Group, said:

“We welcome this announcement by the Minister and encourage her to start by looking at what data is collected about charities across government. Data is an asset that it has at its fingertips and if opened up has the power to transform grantmaking and how charities and government can work together.
“Charities are often asked to submit the same information by different government agencies, in different formats and at different times of the year. Not all of this information is made publicly available or it is locked away in PDFs.
“Developing a more coordinated and data-savvy approach to engaging with charities will not only reduce the reporting burden on charities themselves, but it will save the government time and money and ensure they are receiving the same information and in a consistent way.
“This makes the information easier to access and use helping us gain a better understanding of the true size and scale of the sector and all the important work it does.”

More than 60 of the UK’s leading grantmakers are now sharing more than £10bn worth of data on who, where and what they fund using the 360Giving open data standard that means the information can be shared and compared.

360Giving is focusing on three goals: to support more grantmakers to publish their grants data in an open, accessible and standardised way; to build an evidence base about how open grants data can be used for better decision-making and learning; and to develop tools that help people to understand and use the data.

Among those publishing their information to the 360Giving Standard are the Big Lottery Fund, BBC Children in Need, Comic Relief, Esmée Fairbairn Foundation, Henry Smith Charity, Lloyds Bank Foundation, Paul Hamlyn Foundation, Tudor Trust and the Wolfson Foundation.

The 360Giving Standard is also in use at a local level including several community foundations, local authorities and housing trusts.

Posted in News & Updates

Foundations’ most valuable assets include data

Professor Cathy Pharoah, CASS Business School

Philanthropic foundation spending reached almost £3 billion in 2015/16, its highest level ever according to the latest Foundation Giving Trends[1]. And with the value of foundation investments hitting a record £60 billion, public expectations of what foundations can do with their money are also running high. Private grant-making is equal to around 43% of the government funds channelled through civil society, and is attracting a wave of reviews of how foundations could make an even bigger difference by spending more, better or differently. Most of the debate, however, is occurring in a relative data vacuum. Competing ideas from all-comers on ideal giving strategies and subjects jostle for space in a growing free-for-all, while the rich information on spending which could inform debate remains fragmented, and inconsistently presented in individual annual reports. Initiatives like 360Giving are attempting to address this information gap by establishing a standard way of releasing data that allows grantmakers to share information about their funding in an open and comparable way. In turn, this has led to the creation of searchable platforms such as GrantNav and Beehive, making it easier for non-experts to also use the data

Grant-makers are facing unprecedented levels of need and demand, as government budgets suffer the cumulative effect of annual reductions, and average disposable household income sees its tightest squeeze for five years (Office for National Statistics, July 2017). This means that strategic thinking about the priorities which will ultimately determine foundations’ social impact is crucial. This year’s Foundation Giving Trends shows some ways in which foundations are addressing calls on resources. Many draw on total capital return from investments as well as annual incomes to fund spending. Some use finance in new ways to achieve certain social purposes, with at least 10% of the top philanthropic foundations making social investments. A new exploration of innovation and partnership in the report shows that collaborative approaches are becoming firmly embedded, and foundations of all sizes are working with multiple partners to ensure adequate budgets, drive new ways of working, and focus on impacts.

A good multi-sector example of this is the Arts Impact Fund, a £7 million collaboration including Arts Council England, Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Nesta and Esmée Fairbairn Foundation, with additional funding from Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation. This is a much-needed addition for arts and culture, a field providing a good example of how collective foundation data can identify emerging gaps and inform decision-making. Examination of ‘spending out’ by foundations like Northern Rock, Monument, Paul Getty and Peter Moore which are (or have been) strong supporters of arts and culture indicates that, with government support also reducing, welcome increased spending on arts and culture by foundations like Sackler and Paul Hamlyn will not make up the shortfall. Moreover, long-term data in Foundation Giving Trends reveals that the increased grants spending in 2015/16 derived mainly from the market gains in existing investments, while income from major new gifts into foundations had modest growth. Today’s social needs cannot be met solely by switching existing foundation resources from one area to another, especially if asset growth slowed, and the strong message is that we need more new donors to create foundation endowments.

[1] http://www.acf.org.uk/policy-practice/research-publications/foundation-giving-trends-2017

Posted in Blog

Leaping from a burning platform to a digital one delivers savings and a heap of useful data

Reach Volunteering, a charity that matches professionals that want to volunteer with charities, was facing a stark choice when it took the plunge to digitise its service. Here Reach CEO Janet Thorne shares the compelling drivers that kept them on the sometimes bumpy road to digitisation and transformation.

When we launched our digital platform in August 2015 we were facing the risk that Reach was slowly becoming irrelevant – even redundant – which is a risk that all charities face if they do not think through how they should be incorporating digital. It was the burning platform that inspired us to radical action.

Two years on and £80k later our new online service has, in a year, delivered a 32% increase in placements – the number of trustees and volunteers who have been successfully recruited by charities; and a 24% fall in transaction costs (cost per placement) in the first 6 months of 2017 a new integration with LinkedIn, where all our roles are automatically cross-posted to LInkedIn members, has generated an additional 500 volunteers, who have already made over 370 applications for roles.

We can continue to scale without increasing our cost base – which means that our transaction costs will continue to fall.  We estimate that they will have fallen by 37% by 2019.

Our old offline service was quite clunky and labour intensive to deliver. We had to spend a lot of time doing inefficient things that didn’t add value like passing messages between charities and volunteers. Scaling was never going to be viable, so we started looking at how other brokers were taking advantage of the internet to match supply and demand.

We were inspired by the success of the likes of Kiva and internet dating sites, and realised going online offered us a chance to both scale, through self-service, and to provide a much more personalised and compelling service to our audience of charities and volunteers – more than 60% of whom are under 50.

The promised hike in efficiency and productivity got our trustees’ backing and commitment to spend the time and money needed to build a new platform, which was essential. Having trustees with experience of digital was crucial as they could provide robust support and challenge to the executive, and could take a seasoned view when things went a bit awry.

It took almost two years to build the new platform and website. This probably took longer than it should have done, due to supplier issues. The core product cost about £80k but doesn’t include the staff and volunteer and pro-bono time.

Along the way we have learned a lot including these three key things:

1. Have a really clear and detailed understanding of your users’ needs.

We spent several months undertaking research with charities and volunteers before we started designing the service. We had a holistic understanding of their needs, and of how volunteering fitted into their world. These included charities wanting to be able to manage their recruitment themselves, rather than through an intermediatary, so we built functions such as a dashboard and messaging tools.

Both volunteers and charities were interested in a more flexible range of volunteering opportunities – so our new service incorporates short term projects and ‘remote’ or ‘virtual’ roles which can be done from anywhere.

These user requirements based on hard evidence were our guiding star during the build. It meant that we didn’t compromise on core features or get distracted by shiny new ones.

2. Engage a brilliant product manager – they will ensure that you end up with what you need!

3. Respect the data.

My background is in anthropology, so I’ve always preferred qualitative research, but I am really beginning to understand how valuable quantitative data can be. Digital services and websites generate a wealth of real time data about what your users are doing, and you can experiment with improvements and see if they work, instantly! For example, we’ve almost halved the number of people who don’t complete our volunteer registration form by breaking it down into pages and playing around with the order.

We are currently analysing things such as the conversion rate at each point in our users’ journey from joining, to volunteers applying for a role or charities registering one, to when a match is made. We are looking at this through the lens of different criteria such as where the volunteer first saw the role, or demographic factors like age. There is lots of potential to examine questions of broader interest, like emerging skills gaps, as the data is refined.

Posted in Blog

Social Life’s Community Dynamics Data

Building neighbourhoods where communities can flourish in the long term is as important as designing places that are economically and environmentally sound. How can the success and progress of communities be measured and evaluated over time?

Social Life has developed a new way to understand local communities through the use of data – we call this Community Dynamics Data. Using our social sustainability framework, and drawing in national survey data, we map predictive data about how people feel about the neighbourhoods they live in. This data offers valuable insights into residents’ sense of belonging, local relationships, local satisfaction and perceptions of safety.

Data about this lived, day-to-day experience of local residents is often missing from decision-making processes. Through Community Dynamics Data, Social Life aims to complement the wider sets of data more commonly used by local agencies (e.g. deprivation, crime, public health) to better understand life in neighbourhoods.

This predictive data reveals insights that may inform the design of proposals for new developments, regeneration work on existing neighbourhoods, or plans to implement new services or projects. We are then able to compare actual data about residents’ perceptions to what we would expect it to be, giving us an assessment of how well the area is faring. Or highlighting which areas are likely to have good relationships between different groups, while others have less cohesive communities. Social Life’s research team often uses this data as a starting point, from which further on-the-ground research can be undertaken to explore the themes highlighted.

Exploring these kinds of questions can help everyone involved in shaping neighbourhoods– from residents, to community groups, charities, through to councils, housing associations and housing developers make better decisions about local neighbourhoods. For the funders engaging with 360Giving, the data could also help to explain, at least partially, funding coldspots and hotspots.

Uniquely, this data offers very localised insight. More commonly used datasets about very local areas, such as the Index of Multiple Deprivation, tend to not be available below ‘Lower-layer Super Output Area” (LSOA) level. However, using a method developed by the Office of National Statistics – “Area Classifications” – which categorises small local areas by demographic and socio-economic characteristics, we are able to map people’s predicted subjective experience of where they live down to very small areas, “Output Areas”.

Social Life often use Community Dynamics Data as a starting point in their work with clients, who are interested in finding out more about the strengths of communities in specific neighbourhoods. These clients are keen to gain a better understanding of communities affected by their work and, in doing so, want to take a more assets-based approach to working in those areas. Social Life’s team can provide further research in that locality to explore and test the issues indicated by the data – providing a more thorough picture of the community’s dynamics. If you are interested in finding out more about the work Social Life is doing, please get in touch with their team.

Posted in Blog

A place for open data in the future of philanthropy

Rhodri Davies, Giving Thought Programme Manager at CAF

There is great focus at the moment on the role of cities. The slow decline of many urban areas across the UK has long been lamented as their traditional sustaining industries have disappeared and they struggle to find new identities. This has been exacerbated by the continuing North-South divide that is heavily skewed economically towards London and the South-East. Many are considering what can be done to reverse these trends and make our cities fit for the future.

Philanthropy has been notably absent from this discussion. Many of our urban areas have a rich history of philanthropy that played a vital role in their growth and success. However, as economic fortunes have declined the culture of civic giving has also faded. Although there are still pockets of innovation and inspiration in many places, they are disparate and not connected by a clear narrative about the role that philanthropy can play in the context of our towns and cities.

CAF’s new Giving for the City project aims to address this gap, and to help put philanthropy back at the heart of the debate. We are not harking back to some mythical Victorian golden age, but considering how we can develop a 21st century vision for civic philanthropy to meet the challenges and opportunities of the future. Our latest report, Giving a Sense of Place, outlines what such a vision might look like and what central and local government, elected mayors, charities and others can do to make it a reality.

One of the key themes that emerge in our report is the importance of data. An obvious drawback of philanthropy is that it is based on individual voluntary choices; and as such is unevenly distributed and not always directed in the most effective ways. This cannot be totally overcome without intervening in the right of donors to make voluntary choices, which would undermine the sense of agency that is so vital to philanthropy. However, data can make philanthropic decisions more informed. By developing the evidence base on local needs and priorities within an area, donors can understand where their money would be most effectively deployed and tailor their giving accordingly if they so choose.

The work of organisations like 360Giving in promoting an open data approach among philanthropic funders is a vital piece of this puzzle. And we need to go further, and work with the public and private sectors to ensure they also open up their data so that we can build a truly detailed picture of our local areas. We should also look at new models for collecting data in the first place: for instance the Vital Signs approach being pioneered by a growing number of UK community foundations is a powerful example of a bottom-up approach to understanding local needs and priorities.

There are many key elements to developing a culture of civic philanthropy, in addition to an increased focus on data, which we explore in our report. And there is a definite sense that this is a good moment to be talking about this topic. There is growing interest in place-based approaches within the philanthropic sector, and also new opportunities to influence as a result of the ongoing moves toward greater devolution of political power – including the election of directly-elected mayors in a number of areas for the first time. The combination of these factors means that we have a real opportunity to develop a new golden age of giving within our towns and cities. We should grasp that opportunity.


City Bridge Trust & CAF will be holding an event looking at the role of philanthropy in building London’s civic identity on 24 October 2017. Register your place here.

Posted in Blog

Nine new organisations swell 360Giving dataset

More than £10bn worth of grants are now been published to the 360Giving Standard with the addition of nine more grantmakers in the last two months.

The new organisations include family, corporate and community foundations who collectively add £58m worth of grants, plus $404m from the Arcadia Fund, taking the total number of organisations that are sharing their grants data in an open, comparable way to 52.

Kate Stewart, Director of Programmes of community funder Power to Change which has published 165 grants, totalling £13 million made between 2015 and 2017, says:

“There is no reason that trusts and foundations should be left behind by the move towards data transparency. Indeed, there is no real excuse to let that happen.

“Trusts like Power to Change are, rightly, trying to learn as we progress, so that we are better funders and make the smartest and most effective decisions in the future. And we want to work alongside councils, corporates, charities and more, to have the biggest impact we can in a relatively short time.”

The other eight charitable funders who joined our #greatergrantsdata movement are:

Arcadia Fund, founded by philanthropists Lisbet Rausing and Peter Baldwin to preserve cultures and the environment and promote open access, which has now published 194 grants worth $404 million representing 15 years of grantmaking from 2002 to 2017.

Corra Foundation, previously called Lloyds TSB Foundation for Scotland, that has for 30 years contributed to improving the lives of individuals and communities experiencing disadvantage across Scotland and in developing countries has published 609 grants made between 2015 and 2017 worth £6 million.

Dunhill Medical Trust, which funds research to understanding ageing and age-related diseases, and community-based organisations supporting those in later life, has published 124 grants awarded to community-based organisations worth over £5 million from 2009 to 2017.

Equity Foundation, that supports projects delivering societal change through community projects in the Stockport area, has published 44 grants worth £70k made in 2016 and 2017.

Essex Community Foundation which since 1996 has distributed £30m of charitable funding directly into Essex, Southend and Thurrock making it a great place to live, work, learn and grow, has published 342 grants worth £2 million made between 2016 and 2017.

The Fore, a partnership of the Bulldog and Golden Bottle Trusts which has provided financial and advisory assistance to charities for over 30 years has now published 51 grants between 2013 and 2016 worth £1 million.

Pears Foundation, an independent, British family foundation, rooted in Jewish values, that annually invests between £15m and £20m in good causes focussing on well-being which has now published 224 grants for two years of data up to March 2017 totalling £28.5 million.

Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations (SCVO), the membership body for third sector organisations in Scotland, has published 129 grants worth £1.5 million from 2014 to 2017.

 

Any grantmaking organisation can share their funding data using the 360Giving Standard, regardless of where, what or how much they fund. Find out how you can share your data and help build the bigger picture of UK grantmaking by contacting Katherine Duerden via info@threesixtygiving.org.

Posted in News & Updates

$30k Digital Impact grant aims to improve sharing of grantmaking data

Why and how the Ariadne network of 600 funders collect and share data and how they might do so better will be under exploration thanks to a $30k grant from Digital Impact, part of the Digital Civil Society Lab at Stanford University.

360Giving will advise the network on open data formats as part of the project, with The Engine Room leading the research component. This will include interviews with Ariadne members to understand the risks and emerging best practice in sharing grants data openly. It will cover issues such as data redaction, licensing, informed consent and ownership.

The aim of the project is to address perceived risks around sharing grants data and establish processes to diminish that risk in order to support the whole grantmaking sector to improve how it collects and shares data.

Ariadne and The Engine Room will publish a report and framework in spring 2018 and also take part in a conference at Stanford University to share their learning.

Julie Broome, Ariadne Director, says:

“An effective and just social sector relies on coordination across funders and transparency about what they are supporting, but there are sensitivities in funding information, and sharing data in irresponsible ways can cause harm. This project will examine the data shared by funders in the Ariadne network, and produce actionable learning on members’ data maturity, the perceived impact of opening data, and the decision-making process for opening it. It will produce a responsible data decision-making process and, offer insights into the challenges funders face when publishing data.”

Rachel Rank, 360Giving CEO, says:

“We are excited to be part of this project. The award will fund a key piece of work to understand some of the barriers to publishing open data and will create a rigorous framework to mitigate them which we believe will encourage more sharing of grantmaking data.”

The full list of grantees from this year’s funding round is available via the Digital Impact website.

Posted in News & Updates

Press button data sharing a reality for Community Foundations

A new tool funded by 360Giving will make publishing data a doddle for community foundations that are using Salesforce to manage their grantmaking.

The tool allows community foundations to automatically export data formatted to the 360Giving Standard cutting hours off the time it might otherwise take for them to prepare their data.

The tool has been tested over the summer as part of a pilot project. It was developed in consultation with several community foundations, who fed back on the process and instructions provided. It has been possible to create this tool because the community foundations use the Salesforce platform in the same way. There are now six community foundations sharing their data to the 360Giving Standard, meaning they can all view their grants through the same prism and alongside other funders working in their area.

Network analysis visualisation for UK grantmaking in 2016

Collectively, 46 community foundations awarded £71m worth of grants in the last year, reaching all parts of the UK and investing in a wide range of causes that matter to local people. By making publishing data quick and uniform it delivers huge potential for the Community Foundation movement to identify, aggregate and compare the kind of grants they make. We hope this will not only support their policy work, but also highlight their services to other grantmakers as well as fund seekers.

So far four foundations have tested the tool: Essex, Oxfordshire, Surrey and the Quartet. We shared our findings on the pilot at the recent UKCF conference in Cardiff, where we held a session on data sharing.

Steven Mackenzie, Development Officer for Essex Community Foundation says:

“We are delighted to be able to publicly share our grantmaking and further build the national picture on giving. The clear instructions provided coupled with the automation available within the Salesforce platform we use meant that the whole process could not have been easier.”

Anne-Marie Rogers, Marketing and Communications Executive of Quartet Community Foundation, says:

“We’re passionate about inspiring more philanthropy and we hope others will use this information to make more and better grants. We are transparent about our grantmaking and already publish details of our grants made on our website. By sharing the information with 360Giving we aim to help individual philanthropists, grantmaking trusts and researchers to find more detail on where our grants are going and understand trends across the West of England.”

Kate Peters of Community Foundation Surrey says:

“The new tool has made sharing our data very easy and much easier than I thought. The motivations to share our data are of course transparency which is so important today, but also to inspire and inform donors who are interested in what is going on in the area. We already publish our data, but 360Giving offers a much better way to present data than to have it as a list on our website. The more community foundations share their data the stronger the argument for community foundations as donors and charities will see the breadth of what we do.”

We will continue to work with the Community Foundation network over the coming year to identify shared questions, challenges and ideas for new platforms and tools. We already started by looking at network analysis to see which organisations fund the same grantees. If you have more ideas for using the data please contact info@threesixtygiving.org to find out more about this project and to get involved.

Posted in Blog

Happy 1st birthday to GrantNav – come and join the party!

Rachel Rank, CEO 360Giving

A year ago we launched a UK first with GrantNav, the free to use search tool that lets anyone easily explore and download grants data for some of the UK’s largest charitable funders.

The platform has put grantmaking on a new trajectory that has the potential to crank up the sector’s impact.

GrantNav has experienced phenomenal growth in its first year. When we launched it in September 2016, it included data from 26 funders. It now features more than 200,000 grants worth over £10bn from 48 funders. Collectively, these organisations represent the full gamut of grantmakers and you will recognise many of them including small, large, family, corporate, institutional, local authority and government funders who have joined the #greatergrantsdata movement by sharing their information in an open, comparable way.

People are regularly using GrantNav, with an average of 1,000 different people using it each month. Some are conducting basic searches to see who else is funding the same kind of activities, such as this example from an online forum run by the Alzheimer’s Society, where a user looks at the end dates of grants for dementia projects. Others are building on top of GrantNav search results and using different tools, for example to visualise funding to a specific place.

Using open data to underpin funding decisions is a new science and it’s encouraging to see GrantNav being used by different people in different ways, depending on whether they are data analysts, or (like me) just want to find out who else is funding what without having to wrangle any pivot tables.

The potential of the 360Giving dataset is improving all the time. With more data being opened up every month, we’re able to do more sophisticated network analysis, such as looking at funding patterns. We’re also going to make GrantNav even more user friendly by creating better instructions and examples of use.

When we launched GrantNav in September 2016 it was a UK first, and it remains the only place to access open, comparable data on UK grantmaking. But it isn’t the only show in town.

Other platforms that use 360Giving data are also being created, including CAST’s Beehive Giving, which is working with grant seekers to help match them with the best potential funders; and OSCI’s Local Insight, that looks at the latest data and analysis for local communities and services.

We are delighted to celebrate a year of GrantNav and how quickly it is growing. We now need you to bring your information and questions to the party and help it come of age.

We run regular Data Surgeries which bring grantmakers together to talk about sharing and using the funding information they collect. Keep an eye on our Twitter feed to find out when the next Surgery is: @360Giving

In the next few months we’ll also be launching a Challenge Fund that will look at common challenges faced by organisations and how funding data can be used to help answer them. Look out for details on our website and via Twitter.

GrantNav will be improved by having more data, which in turn will encourage more users. As the dataset grows, so does the usefulness of GrantNav. If you would like to know how you can open up your grants data then please get in touch.

http://grantnav.threesixtygiving.org/

Posted in Blog